Recall that if \(x=a\) is a stationary point then we use \(x=a+y\), \(|y| \ll 1\) to change the coordinate to \(y\), such that \[\dot{y}= {D} f(a) y + O (|y|^2)\] and linearisation is \(\dot{y}=Ay\), \(A={D}f(a)\) (Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives).
It turns out that nodes, foci and degenerate nodes retain their basic properties under small nonlinear perturbations, so this makes it possible to obtain approximate phase portraits for some systems (ignoring periodic orbits for the moment).
We can sketch the phase portrait in three stages: first find the stationary points, then determine their types and the local phase portrait assuming the linear approximation is valid, and then put this information together to create a consistent global phase portrait.
Stationary Points: \(\dot r=0\) if \(r=0\) or \(r+s=3\) whilst \(\dot s =0\) if \(s=0\) or \(2r+s=4\). Hence the stationary points are \begin{align*} r & = 0, \; \; s=0, \qquad \qquad (0,0) \\ r & = 0, \; \; s=4, \qquad \qquad (0,4) \\ s & = 0, \; \; r=3, \qquad \qquad (3,0) \end{align*} together with the solution of the simultaneous equations \[ r+s = 3, \qquad 2r+ s = 4 \] if they exist. Solving gives a fourth stationary point, \(r=1\) and \(s=2\), i.e. \((1,2)\). Note that the \(r\)-axis and the \(s\)-axis are invariant. Linearisation: \[ {D} f(\underline{x}) = \begin{pmatrix} 3 - 2r - s & -r \\ -2s & 4-2r-2s \\ \end{pmatrix} \] At \((0,0):\) \[ {D} f(0,0)= \begin{pmatrix} 3& 0 \\ 0&4 \\ \end{pmatrix}. \] The eigenvalues are \(3\) and \(4\) with eigenvectors \(\begin{pmatrix} 1 \cr 0 \end{pmatrix}\) and \(\begin{pmatrix} 0 \cr 1 \end{pmatrix}\) respectively, so it is an unstable node, with almost all solutions tangential to the \(r\)-axis and the local solution is as sketched in Figure 3.11).At \((0,4):\) \({D} f(0,4)= \begin{pmatrix} -1& 0 \\ -8& -4 \\ \end{pmatrix} \) The eigenvalues are \(-1,-4\) so it is a stable node. The eigenvectors are \( e_{-1}=\begin{pmatrix} 3 \cr {-8} \end{pmatrix}\) and \(\begin{pmatrix} 0 \cr 1\end{pmatrix}\) respectively, so almost all solutions are tangential to \( e_{-1}\) at the stationary point. See Figure 3.11.
At \((3,0):\) \({D} f(3,0)= \begin{pmatrix} -3& -3 \\ 0& -2 \\ \end{pmatrix} \) so the eigenvalues are \(-3\) with eigenvector \(\begin{pmatrix} 1 \cr 0 \end{pmatrix}\) and \(-2\) with eigenvector \(e_2\begin{pmatrix} {-3}\cr 1 \end{pmatrix}\). So it is a stable node and almost all solutions are tangential to \(e_{2}\) at the stationary point.
At \((1,2):\) \({D} f(1,2)= \begin{pmatrix} -1& -1 \\ -4&-2 \\ \end{pmatrix} \) so the characteristic equation is \((s+1)(s+2)-4=0\) or \(s^2 + 3s - 2 = 0\), i.e. \(s_\pm = \frac{-3 \pm \sqrt{17}}{2}\). Since \(s_{+}>0\) and \(s_{-}<0\) is a saddle and the eigenvectors are \(e_\pm=\begin{pmatrix} {-1} \cr {s_\pm+1} \end{pmatrix}\), so \(e_+\) slopes downwards and \(e_-\) slopes upwards.
Basically, the stability/instability of any stationary point can be implied from the linearised system, when no eigenvalue has zero real part. These points are called hyperbolic fixed points. Otherwise, fixed points with zero real part in their eigenvalues (like centres) are called non-hyperbolic fixed point. The behaviours near these stationary points are more difficult to study: while all orbits around centres are periodic, there could be no periodic solutions when nonlinear higher order terms are added.