Week 5 Exercises — solutions

Version 2024/10/30. These exercises in PDF To other course material

  • Exercise 5.1. Let A be a subspace of a topological space X. Prove: if FA and F is closed in X, then F is closed in A.

Answer to E5.1. [These exercises without answers]

Assume that FAX and that F is closed as a subset of X, meaning that XF is open in X. To show that F is also closed as a subset of A, we write

AF=(XF)A.

This means that by definition of subspace topology on A, the set AF is open in A: this is a set of the form “(open in X)A”. Hence F is closed in A.

  • Exercise 5.2 (unions and intersections of compact sets). Let X be a topological space.

    • 1. Show that a union of two compact subsets of X is compact.

    • 2. Assuming that X is Hausdorff, show that an intersection of two compact subsets of X is compact. (Why do we need X to be Hausdorff?)

Answer to E5.2. [These exercises without answers]

Let K and L be two compact subsets of X.

1. We use Criterion of Compactness for Subsets 4.1 to show that M=KL is compact. Suppose that M is covered by a collection C of sets open in X. Then C covers K (because KM). Since K is compact, there exists a finite subcollection U1,,UmC which still covers K.

In the same way, there exists a finite subcollection V1,,VnC which covers L. Then the finite subcollection U1,,Um,V1,,Vn of C covers KL=M. By constructing a finite subcollection of C which still covers M, we have verified the Criterion of Compactness for M; hence M is compact.

2. In a Hausdorff space, a compact set is closed, Proposition 4.4, hence both K and L are closed in X.

Intersections of closed sets are closed, Proposition 2.4, so KL is closed in X.

By the previous exercise, KL is also closed in K. A closed subset of a compact is compact, Proposition 4.3, so KL is compact.

  • Exercise 5.3 (nested sequence of closed subsets in a compact). Let K be a compact topological space. Assume that F1F2F3, where Fi is a non-empty closed subset of K for each i1. Prove that all the sets Fi have a common point.

Answer to E5.3. [These exercises without answers]

Note that the question is about a collection of closed sets, whereas the definition of “compact” is in terms of open sets. The main idea is to pass to the complement and apply the De Morgan laws.

We are asked to prove that the intersection i=1Fi is not empty. Equivalently, considering the complements Ui=KFi (which are open), we need to prove that the union i=1Ui is not the whole of K.

Assume for contradiction that

i=1Ui=K.

Then the collection U1,U2, is an open cover of K. Since K is compact, there is a finite subcover Ui1,,Uin so that

Ui1Uin=K.

Now note that U1U2U3, and therefore Ui1Uin=Uj where j=max(i1,,in). We have

Uj=KFj=.

Yet the sets Fi were given to be non-empty. This contradiction shows that our assumption was false.

  • Exercise 5.4 (a Hausdorff compact topology is “optimal”). Let (X,T) be a Hausdorff compact topological space. Use the Topological Inverse Function Theorem to show that

    • 1. any topology on X, which is strictly weaker than T, is not Hausdorff;

    • 2. any topology on X, which is strictly stronger than T, is not compact.

Answer to E5.4. [These exercises without answers]

1. A topology Tw on X is weaker than T iff the identity function idX:(X,T)(X,Tw) is continuous. (We note that the function idX is always bijective.)

Assume that (X,T) is compact and (X,Tw) is Hausdorff. Then by, TIFT, the continuous bijection idX:(X,T)(X,Tw) is a homeomorphism. That is, a set U is T-open iff its image idX(U)=U is Tw-open. But this means that Tw=T. Hence it is not possible for a Hausdorff Tw to be strictly weaker than T.

Part 2. is done in a similar way and is left to the student.

References for the exercise sheet

E5.1 is a variant of [Sutherland, Exercise 10.5]. E5.2 is [Sutherland, Exercises 13.3 and 13.10]. E5.3 is [Sutherland, Exercise 13.11].

Version 2024/10/30. These exercises in PDF To other course material