Week 2 Metric topology. Open covers and bases. Subspace topology. Continuous functions
Version 2024/11/15 Week 2 in PDF All notes in PDF To other weeks
Discrete, antidiscrete and cofinite topology on a set
We will now connect abstract topology to the theory of metric spaces, studied in MATH21111. Metric spaces will provide us with a very rich class of examples of topological spaces.
Metric topologies. Euclidean topologies
Here is an equivalent definition of an open set given in MATH21111 Metric spaces.
Definition: open balls and open sets in a metric space.
Let
A
We quote a key result proved in MATH21111:
Theorem 2.1: metric-open sets in a metric space form a topology.
If
Topologies arising from metrics deserve a special definition:
Definition: metric topology, metrisable topological space.
The topology
A topological space
We now introduce what is arguably the most frequently used class of metric spaces and metric topologies. Let
makes
Definition: Euclidean topology, Euclidean space.
The metric topology on
Furthermore, arbitrary subsets of
Example: every subset of a Euclidean space is a topological space.
If
We will study subspace topology in more detail in the next chapter.
A base of a topology. Open covers
The definition of an open set in a metric space (a union of open balls) motivates two notions which apply to arbitrary topologies.
Definition: open cover; base of a topology.
Let
An open cover of
A base of the topology
Remark 1: every topology has at least one base. For example, the whole collection
Remark 2: a base
Moreover,
We have shown that all sets in
Remark 3: although every base is an open cover, not every open cover is a base. For example, the Euclidean space
Example 2.2: open balls form a base of a metric topology.
By definition, a metric topology
Does the Euclidean topology on
First of all, we note that a metric
Proposition 2.3: Lipschitz equivalent metrics are topologically equivalent.
Suppose that the metrics
Then
Note that this is not an if-and-only-if result: there may be metrics on
Remark: it was shown in MATH21111 Metric spaces that the Euclidean metric
and also to the metric
In fact, for all
which shows that
However, Example 2.2 tells us that each of the three metrics defines a base for the Euclidean topology; the base consists of open balls of arbitrary radii around each point in the
plane. We note that these balls are of different shape. Figure 2.1 shows the
-
• a base which consists of all open
-rhombuses around each point; -
• a base which consists of all open
-discs around each point; -
• a base which consists of all open
-squares around each point of the plane.
There are, of course, infinitely many more bases for the Euclidean topology on
Figure 2.1: Each of the three metrics
Continuous functions
One of the reasons to introduce a topological space as a more general structure than a metric space is to be able to define continuous functions without a metric.
Let
Definition: image of an element, image of a set, preimage of a set.
Let
is the image of the set
is called the preimage of the set
We are now going to define continuity, which does require a topology on both
Definition: continuous function.
Let
Remark: in MATH21111 Metric Spaces, this was shown to be an equivalent definition of continuity. This means that when
-
• the
- definition of continuity for functions between metric spaces; -
• the topological definition of continuity, given above.
When
Warning: remember,
“
It is not true for a general continuous function that images of open subsets of
It is often useful to characterise continuous functions in terms of closed sets, which we will now define.
Closed sets
Definition: closed set.
Let
This definition means that every subset
-
•
is open and closed; for example, or -
•
is open but not closed; for example, (Euclidean topology), -
•
is closed but not open; for example, (Euclidean topology), -
•
is neither open nor closed; for example, (Euclidean topology),
The last three examples are illustrated by Figure 2.2.
Figure 2.2: A subset of
Alert.
“Not open” does not mean “closed”!
The collection of closed sets in
Proposition 2.4: properties of closed sets.
If
-
(a)
and are closed in -
(b) arbitrary intersections of closed sets are closed,
-
(c) finite unions of closed sets are closed.
-
Proof. Since closed sets are complements of open sets, these properties follow by applying the De Morgan laws to the properties of open sets in Proposition 1.1. □
Proposition 2.5: the closed set criterion of continuity.
A function
-
Proof. The key point of the proof is the following property of preimages:
in other words, the preimage of a complement is the complement of the preimage. (See the week 1 tutorial where this was discussed.)
Assume that
is continuous. Let be any closed set in Then is open in We compute as follows: Since is open (by continuity of ), its complement is closed, as required. We proved that the preimage of every closed set is closed.Now assume that the preimage of every closed set under
is closed. Let be any open set in Then the complement of is closed in so, by assumption, is closed in Yet equals and, since this set is closed, must be open. We proved that the preimage of every open set is open, and so we have verified the definition of “continuous” for □
Easy properties and examples of continuous functions
Unlike in Mathematical Foundations and Analysis, in general we cannot form “sums” or “products” of continuous functions from
Proposition 2.6: composition of continuous functions is continuous.
Suppose
-
Proof. The key point of the proof is the formula for the preimage under composition, left as an exercise to the student:
Let
be any open subset of Since is continuous, is open in Since is continuous, is open in We have proved that is open in and so we have verified the definition of “continuous” for □
Solution: for any
Solution: if
As
Subspace topology. The inclusion map
Every subset of a topological space is made a topological space in its own right, as follows.
Definition: subspace topology.
Let
A subset
The collection
The definition of “open in
Figure 2.3: meaning of “a subset
Strictly speaking, we need to prove that a “subspace topology” is indeed a topology. We do not go through the proof, given below, in class, and it is often left as an exercise in the literature.
Example: subspace topology is indeed a topology.
Let
Solution (not given in class): Axiom (i) of topology requires
Axiom (ii) requires that the union of any subcollection of
(the last step is a known distributive law for
Axiom (iii) of topology requires that if
To each subspace of
Definition: inclusion map.
Let
If
Proposition 2.7: the inclusion map is continuous.
If
-
Proof. Let
be an arbitrary open subset of The preimageis open in
by definition of subspace topology. Continuity of is proved. □
References for the week 2 notes
The Euclidean space
A base of a topology is defined in the same way in [Armstrong, Section 2.1] but is called a basis in [Sutherland, Definition 8.9].
Proposition 2.3 that Lipshitz equivalence implies topological equivalence is [Sutherland, Proposition 6.34]. Metrics
Figure 2.1 is based on LaTeX/TikZ code generated by OpenAI ChatGPT in response to the following prompt by YB given below. YB made minor edits to the code to improve visual appearance.
Can you produce LaTeX or TikZ code which would generate drawing showing, in the same pair of coordinate axes, the image of the
-unit ball around the origin, the -unit ball around the origin, and the -unit ball around the origin in the plane ? The three unit balls must be of different color. Here denotes the "Manhattan metric" on the plane, is the Euclidean metric, and is the metric where the distance between the points and is defined as .
The definition of a continuous function via preimages of open sets is standard in topology, see [Sutherland, Definition 8.1]. However, [Armstrong]
uses a different definition, shown to be equivalent to ours in [Armstrong,
Theorem (2.6)]. In this course, we do not need the notion “
Closed sets are defined in [Sutherland, Definition 9.1], and our
Proposition 2.4 is [Sutherland, Proposition 9.4]. Our closed set criterion of continuity, Proposition 2.5, is [Sutherland, Proposition 9.5], yet Sutherland omits the proof.
Proposition 2.6, continuity of composition, is [Sutherland, Proposition 8.4]. Our examples showing that
Figure 2.3 is based on TikZ code generated by OpenAI ChatGPT when asked to
illustrate the definition of subspace topology. The area of
Our definition of subspace topology is [Sutherland, Definition 10.3], and the proof that it is a topology solves [Sutherland, Exercise 10.2]. Proposition 2.7, the inclusion map is continuous, is [Sutherland, Proposition 10.4].
Version 2024/11/15 Week 2 in PDF All notes in PDF To other weeks