Uniform distribution

In this section we will study more closely the statistical properties of irrational rotation dynamics. Fix an irrational number α and define T on [0,1) by T(x)=x+αmod1 for all x[0,1). Given E[0,1) we investigate for each NN the statistical quantity |{0nN1:Tn(x)E}|N and in particular wish to understand whether its limit exists as N.

How can we analyse this average? There is a fruitful way to rewrite it in terms of functions. We have |{0nN1:Tn(x)E}|N=1Nn=0N11E(Tn(x)) for all NN and this suggests considering more generally averages of the form 1Nn=0N1f(Tn(x)) for f:[0,1)R.

First we note that the limit of the above quantity, if it exists, is well-behaved under uniform convergence. Recall that fk converges to g uniformly, if, for every ϵ>0 there is KN such that kK||fkg||u<ϵ holds. Here the expression ||h||u=sup{|h(x)|:xX} is the uniform norm of h:XC. It is convenient to write uniform convergence in terms of the uniform norm, but we are not describing a new type of convergence; we have only rephrased the definition of uniform convergence we are used to from real analysis. In particular, for example, it is true that if fkg uniformly and each fk is continuous then g will also be continuous.

Proposition

Fix a sequence kfk of functions from X to C that converges uniformly to a function g:XC. If limN1Nn=0N1fk(Tnx) exists for every kN then limN1Nn=0N1g(Tnx)=limklimN1Nn=0N1fk(Tnx) and in particular the limit on the left-hand side exists.

Proof:

Since kfk is in particular a Cauchy sequence for the uniform norm one can show kα(k)=limN1Nn=0N1fk(Tnx) is a Cauchy sequence of real numbers and therefore converges to a limit, say β.

Fix ϵ>0. Choose k so large that ||fkg||u<ϵ2 and |βlimN1Nn=0N1fk(Tn(x))|<ϵ2 both hold. Choose then M so large that NM|α1Nn=0N1fk(Tn(x))|<ϵ2 holds. For every NM we have |α1Nn=0N1g(Tn(x))|<ϵ by the triangle inequality.

On [0,1) there is a special collection of functions for which the average is straightforward to analyze and which approximate all other continuous functions with respect to the uniform norm. These are the exponential functions ψk(x)=exp(2πikx) defined for each kZ.

Theorem

For every continuous function g:XC and every ϵ>0 there are r(1),,r(s) in Z and c(1),,c(s) in C such that ||c(1)ψr(1)++c(s)ψr(s)g||u<ϵ holds.

Proof:

We will take this result for granted. It can be deduced from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem or proved directly via analysis of the Fejér kernel.

Let us then analyze the average 1Nn=0N1ψk(Tn(x)) as N for each kZ. Since ψ0=1 we clearly have limN1Nn=0N1ψ0(Tn(x))=1 for all xX and proceed assuming k0. We can calculate n=0N1ψk(Tn(x))=n=0N1exp(2πik(x+nα))=exp(2πikx)1exp(2πikNα)1exp(2πikα) using the geometric series formula because α is irrational. Now |n=0N1ψk(Tn(x))|2|1exp(2πikα)| for all NN and, since the upper-bound is independent of N we have limN1Nn=0N1ψk(Tn(x))=0 for all non-zero kZ and all xX.

Combining all of the above, we conclude that limN1Nn=0N1f(Tn(x)) exists for every xX and every continuous function f:XC. In fact, more is true. We have limN1Nn=0N1f(Tn(x))=01f(x)dx=fdμ for every continuous function f:XC and every xX.

To finish, let us return to f=1E where E=[a,b) is a sub-interval. We cannot approximate 1[a,b) by continuous functions with respect to the uniform norm because the function 1[a,b) is not continuous! However, we can find for every ϵ0 continuous functions g,h from X to [0,1] with g1[a,b)h and 0hgdμ<ϵ from which 1Nn=0N1g(Tn(x))1Nn=0N11[a,b)(Tn(x))1Nn=0N1h(Tn(x)) follows for all NN and all x[0,1). Taking the limit as N the expression limN1Nn=0N11[a,b)(Tn(x)) is forced to exist as it is sandwiched between gdμ and hdμ which, as we make ϵ smaller and smaller, both converge to ba. Thus we have proved the following theorem.

Theorem

Fix α irrational. For all 0a<b1 we have limN|{0nN1:anαmod1<b}|N=ba for all x[0,1).

We say that the sequence nα is uniformly distributed mod 1. It is remarkable that the result is true simultaneously for all intervals [a,b)[0,1).