Week 9 Worksheet - Solutions
Home | Assessment | Notes | Worksheets | Blackboard
Poles and Residues
- has simple zeroes at each of so its reciprocal has simple poles at all three of those points.
- Since is non-zero at every and we can say that the ratio has a simple pole at every . Now
using our lemma on residues of ratios at simple poles.
- The numerator is non-zero at each of the simple zeroes of the denominator so the function has a simple pole at each of these zeroes. Now
but we can calculate more easily that
using our lemma about residues of ratios at simple poles.
- The denominator is which has zeroes of order two at and . Since the numerator is non-zero at and the ratio has poles of order two at both and . We calculate the residues using our lemma for residues at higher-order poles.
- From the Taylor series
has a simple pole at the origin with a residue of 1.
- First note that
so we can write
showing a pole of order two at the origin with a residue of .
- On we have
so thereon. Similarly, on we have
so thereon.
- From the above series has a simple pole at and a pole of order two at . The residue at the origin is 1 and the residue at 1 is .
- Since the numerator is never zero and has a simple zero at ; a zero of order two at ; we conclude that has a simple pole at and a pole of order two at . The residues are
and
respectively, confirming our earlier answers.
- We can write
so the residue at is 6.
- The denominator has Taylor series
so the order of the zero at the origin is three. Since the numerator is non-zero at the origin we have a pole of order three at the origin. We therefore (taking in our residue lemma) must calculate
which has the form if we simply plug in . To proceed we must calculate the orders of the zeroes of the numerator and the denominator.
so we can write
finally.
- We can write and where are holomorphic on some and both are non-zero. Thus
with holomorphic on and non-zero at . The coefficient in the Taylor series of at is therefore non-zero and from
we see that has a zero of order at .
Cauchy's Residue Theorem
- First factor to see that the integrand has simple poles at and . Both are inside and so
by Cauchy's residue theorem. It remains to calculate the residues
giving .
- This is the same function as a) but the contour now only contains one of the poles: the simple pole at 2. Thus
- Fix . Since is holomorphic and never zero, the integrand has simple poles at and . Both are inside . The residues are
so Cauchy's residue theorem gives
because both winding numbers are .