Week 2 Worksheet - Solutions

Home | Assessment | Notes | Worksheets | Blackboard

Functions

  1. Write z=x+iy. For f(z)=Re(z) we have u(x,y)=x and v(x,y)=0. For f(z)=|z|=x2+y2 we have u(x,y)=x2+y2 and v(x,y)=0.

    1. (x+iy)2=x2y2+2xyi so u(x,y)=x2y2 and v(x,y)=2xy.
    2. (u)(x,y)=2x,2y and (v)(x,y)=2y,2x.
    3. Calculate (u)(x,y)(v)(x,y)=2x,2y2y,2x=(2x)(2y)+(2y)(2x)=0

    1. u(x,y)=xx2+y2 and v(x,y)=yx2+y2
    2. Fix kR non-zero. The equation u(x,y)=k has the form xx2+y2=kkx2x+y2=0k(x12k)214k+ky2=0 so we have (x12k)2+y2=(12k)2 which is a circle centered at (12k,0) of radius 12k.
  2. Fix aC non-zero. We need to prove that limza1z=1a holds. Fix ϵ>0. If |za|<|a|/2 then ||z||a||<|a|/2 so |z|>|a|/2. We then have |1z1a|=|zaza|2|a|2|za| which will be at most ϵ if |za|=ϵ|a|2/4. Take δ=min{|a|/2,ϵ|a|2/4}.
    1. With z=t we have limt0|t|t=1 and with z=it we have limt0|it|it=i so the complex limit does not exist.

    2. Here ||z|2z|=|z| which does go to zero as z0.

    3. With z=t>0 we have limt0Arg(t)=0 while with z=it we have limt0Arg(t)=π2 so the complex limit does not exist.

    1. One can use the fact that |Re(z)Re(a)||za| to prove limzaRe(z)=Re(a) for all aC. Therefore f is continuous on C.

    2. Use the reverse triangle inequality ||z||a|||za| to prove that limza|z|=|a| holds.

    3. Fix aC(,0] and put θ=Arg(a).

Holomorphic Functions

    1. We calculate f(z+h)=z2+2zh+h2+z+h so that f(z+h)f(z)h=2zh+h2+hh=2z+h+1 and limh0f(z+h)f(z)h=limh02z+h+1=2z+1 for all zC.

    2. We calculate f(z+h)f(z)h=1z+h1zh=h(z+h)zh=1(z+h)z and limh0f(z+h)f(z)h=limh01(z+h)z=1z2 for all zC{0}.

    1. From the definition limh0f(h)f(0)h=|h|2h=limh0hhh=limh0h=0 so the function has a derivative of zero at the origin.

    2. Fix zC. The limit limh0f(z+h)f(z)h=limh0(z+h)(z+h)zzh=limh0zh+zh+|h|2h does not exist because if h=t is real we get limt0zt+zt+t2t=z+z whereas if h=it is imaginary we get limt0zitzit+t2it=zz so f is not differentiable at any non-zero z. It is therefore not holomorphic on any domain.

Cauchy-Riemann Equations

  1. From the definition (1h)(x,y)=limt0h(x+t,y)h(x,y)t=limt02(x+t)y2xyt=limt02y=2y and (2h)(x,y)=limt0h(x,y+t)h(x,y)t=limt02x(y+t)2xyt=limt02x=2x as expected from rules of differentiation.

  2. From 1z=xiyx2+y2=xx2+y2+i(y)x2+y2 we get u(x,y) and v(x,y). The partial derivatives are (1u)(x,y)=(x2+y2)2x(x)(x2+y2)2=y2x2(x2+y2)2(2u)(x,y)=2xy(x2+y2)2 and (1v)(x,y)=2xy(x2+y2)2(2u)(x,y)=(x2+y2)+2y(y)(x2+y2)2=y2x2(x2+y2)2 so the Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied.

  3. For this function u(x,y)=x2+y2 and v(x,y)=0. Thus (1u)(x,y)=xx2+y2(2u)(x,y)=yx2+y2 and (1v)(x,y)=(2v)(x,y)=0 for all (x,y)(0,0). The Cauchy- Riemann equations are therefore not satisfied at any non-zero complex number.

    Since the partial derivatives of u do not even exist at (0,0) the function f is certainly not differentiable there.

  4. We calculate (1u)(x,y)=3x23y2(2u)(x,y)=6xy(1v)(x,y)=6xy(2v)(x,y)=3x23y2 and see that the equations are satisfied for all (x,y).

    From u(x,y)+iv(x,y)=x3+3ix2y3xy2y3 we see that f(z)=z3=(x+iy)3 has the above real and imaginary parts.

  5. We write 1(x+iy)4=(xiy)4(x2+y2)4=x44ix3y6x2y2+4ixy3+y4(x2+y2)4 so that u and v are the real and imaginary parts of f(z)=1z4 on C{0}. Since f is holomorphic on that domain, the Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied for all z therein.

  6. We calculate 1(1u)+2(2u)=1(2v)+2(1v)=1(2v)2(1v)=0 by Clairaut's theorem.

  7. From an earlier problem we have u(x,y)=x33xy2v(x,y)=3x2yy3 and can calculate that 1(1u)+2(2u)=1(3x23y2)+2(6xy)=6x6x=01(1v)+2(2v)=1(3x23y2)+2(6xy)=6x6x=0 as desired.

  8. We have (1u)(x,y)=5x430x2y2+5y4(2u)(x,y)=20x3y+20xy3 so (1v)(x,y)=20x3y20xy3(2v)(x,y)=5x430x2y2+5y4 from the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Partially integrating gives 5x4y10x2y3+y5+h(x)=v(x,y)=5x4y10x2y3+g(y) which will be satisfied if e.g. h(x)=0 and g(y)=y5. Then f(x+iy)=(x510x3y2+5xy4)+i(5x4y10x2y3+y5)=(x+iy)5 and f(z)=z5.

  9. We have (1u)(x,y)=3x2ky2+12y12(2u)(x,y)=2kxy+12x so (1v)(x,y)=2kxy12x(2v)(x,y)=3x2ky2+12y12 from the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Partially integrating gives 3x2yk3y3+6y212y+h(x)=v(x,y)=kx2y6x2+g(y) and therefore 3x2y=kx2y if h(x)=6x2 and g(y)=k3y3+6y212y. Therefore, the only value of k for which u could possibly be the real part of a holomorphic function is 3. When k=3 we have v(x,y)=3x2y6x2y3+6y212y and u,v are the real and imaginary parts of f(z)=z3+6iz212z.

  10. If u is constant and the real part of a holomorphic function then the Cauchy-Riemann equations would force (1v)(x,y)=0=(2v)(x,y) whence v is constant as well.

  11. In the purported situation the Cauchy-Riemann equations become u(x)=(1u)(x,y)=(2v)(x,y)=v(y)0=(2u)(x,y)=(1v)(x,y)=0 which tells us that u and v are constant. But then u(x)=μx+b and v(y)=νy+c. Put λ=μ+iν and a=b+ic.

  12. If we apply 1 to the equation we get 0=2(1u)(x,y)+(1v)(x,y)=2(2v)(x,y)+(1v)(x,y) from the Cauchy-Riemann equations. We get 0=2(2u)(x,y)+(2v)(x,y)=2(1v)(x,y)+(2v)(x,y) if we apply instead 2. Adding twice the first equation to the second gives 5(2v)(x,y)=0 for all (x,y). It then follows from the second equation that (1v)(x,y)=0 for all (x,y). The Cauchy-Riemann equations then gives (1u)(x,y)=0 and (2u)(x,y)=0 for all (x,y). We conclude that u and v are constant, so that f is as well.