9.1 Poles
Home | Assessment | Notes | Worksheets | Blackboard
We finished last week with a classification of isolated singularitites. Now we will say more about poles, building up to Cauchy's residue theorem. All of our examples of functions on with poles were ratios where and were holomorphic on and was zero. We begin by being a bit more precise about such examples.
Definition (Zero)
A function on a domain has a zero at if .
We will only be interested in isolated zeros.
Definition (Isolated Zero)
Fix a domain . A function has an isolated zero at if and there is such that does not have a zero on .
When is holomorphic and we can write as a Taylor series
around . If is a zero of then . It may be that other coefficients are zero as well. We can classify zeros by the number of consecutive coefficients in the above expansion that are themselves zero.
Definition (Simple Zero)
When is holomorphic with a zero at we say that is a zero of order if in the Taylor series of around are zero, and is non-zero. A zero of order is called a simple zero.
Example
Here are some examples of zeroes and their orders.
- has a zero of order two at .
- has a zero of order three at and a simple zero at .
- has simple zeros at and .
We know from Taylor's theorem that so the order of a zero of is related to the number of derivatives of that have a zero at . For example, if and then has a simple zero at .
Example
More examples of zeroes and their orders.
- has a zero at . Since the zero is a simple zero.
- has a zero at . Here which also has a zero at . But so the zero has order two.
Lemma
If is holomorphic and has a zero of order at then on every ball we have
where is holomorphic and .
Proof:
Fix and let
be the Taylor series of around . By definition of the order of a zero the coefficients are all zero and is non-zero. We therefore have
and define
on . Since we have . Moreover, the power series defining has radius of convergence at least by the Cauchy-Hadamard theorem.
We can now describe for a precise relationship between the zeros of and the poles of .
Theorem
Fix holomorphic functions . If and has a zero of order at then defined by has a pole of order at .
Proof:
In accordance with the previous lemma write where is holomorphic and . Define by . As and is an isolated zero of of the function is holomorphic on some and has a Taylor expansion
thereon. Now for we calculate that
giving a Laurent series representation of on . Since the function does indeed have a pole of order at .
Example
Some examples of poles and their orders.
- Define on by . Since and has a zero of order two at we conclude from the theorem that has a pole of order two at .
- Define on by . Since has a zero at every integer and does not have a zero at any integer, it follows from the theorem that has a simple pole at every integer.