4.1 Differentiating of Power Series
Home | Assessment | Notes | Index | Worksheets | Blackboard
We defined many interesting functions via power series. Our goal in this section is to verify that power series are holomorphic on their open ball of convergence, and that their derivatives are easy to calculate.
Fix a power series
with radius of convergence . Define by
for all . We do not know yet whether is holomorphic, but if it were, a reasonable guess for its derivative would be
which is itself a power series with th coefficient . To verify this is the case we need to do three things.
- Prove the purported derivative has radius of convergence .
- Prove is holomorphic on .
- Prove equals the purported derivative on .
The first step will make use of the following result, which will be on the exercise sheet.
Lemma
For every the series
converges.
Proof:
This follows from the ratio test:
so the series converges absolutely whenever .
In fact
which will be on the problem sheet.
Lemma
If a power series
has radius of convergence then the power series
converges absolutely on the open ball .
Proof:
Fix and choose such that . Then
converges absolutely. Hence the summands must be bounded: there is such that for all .
Let and note that . Then
but
converges by the previous lemma. Hence
converges by the comparison test. We conclude that
converges absolutely.
Remark
The Cauchy-Hadamard theorem can be used to prove that the two power series have the same radius of convergence.
The second and third steps will be proved together in the following theorem.
Theorem (Differentiating Power Series)
If a power series
has radius of convergence then it is holomorphic on the open ball and its derivative there is
as hoped.
Proof:
Write
and
for all . We need to compare the quantities
and
as we need to prove their difference tends to zero as .
The first terms in both expressions agree. The second terms are
and these are close for small. We can make similar arguments for later terms in the series, but cannot carry out the argument for all terms simultaneously as the errors would conspire against us. What we need, therefore, is to bound the tails of the two series separately, and then choose small enough to control the remaining terms manually. Formally, this goes as follows.
Fix with . Fix . Choose such that . If then we also . For such we can estimate
and, as in the proof of the previous lemma, find such that
both hold. Now
are both polynomials in taking the same value at . Therefore, continuity of polynomials implies there is such that guarantees
giving the result when combined with the previous estimate.